Work and activism: re-education and counter-hegemonic practices to eradicate male violence
Abstract
Let us propose the following problematization, namely: to analyze men as subjects of study, and their gender logic as an object. The previous motivation responds to the fact that in conventional studies of masculinities the starting point is usually the other way around: the masculinity that certain men experience is analyzed and in many occasions the reminiscence of this masculinity in the (structural) logic of gender is ignored. In this paper we invite the latter, analyzing men in specific contexts in which their gender practice (masculinity) is questioned and challenged and, in addition, has an impact on the structural logic of gender.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Delphy, C. (1998). L’ennemi principal. I. Economie politique du patriarcat, Syllepse. Paris.
Thiers-Vidal, L. (2013). Rupture anarchiste et trahison pro-féministe. Ecrits et échanges de Léo Thiers-Vidal, Lyon: La source d´or.
Whelehan, I. (1995). "Hombres en el feminismo" (traduccioÌn de JoseÌ MariÌa Espada). En Modern feminist thought: from the second wave to "post-feminism". Edimburgh: Edimburgh University Press.
Downloads
Published
2021-11-30
How to Cite
Fuller Osores, N., Fernández Chagoya, M. A., & Olavarria Aranguren, J. (2021). Work and activism: re-education and counter-hegemonic practices to eradicate male violence. Revista Latinoamericana De Antropologia Del Trabajo, 5(12). Retrieved from https://ojs.ceil-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/lat/article/view/963
Issue
Section
Editorial